Smollett was convicted of five counts of disorderly conduct, each count representing an instance of reporting a false claim, for allegedlyplanning an elaborate fake hate-crimeon himself in 2019, where two men reportedlyattacked him with bleach, called him racial and homophobic slurs and put a noose around his neck.
In response, Smollett’s attorney Nenye Uche said in an exclusive statement to PEOPLE that he’s “pleased” with the ruling.
“This was not a prosecution based on facts, rather it was a vindictive persecution and such a proceeding has no place in our criminal justice system,” Uche said. The statement added that the “rule of law was the big winner.”
Dan K. Webb, the special prosecutor who was appointed Smollett’s case in 2019, said in a statement that he “respectfully disagree[s]” with Thursday’s ruling.
“Make no mistake—today’s ruling has nothing to do with Mr. Smollett’s innocence,” Webb said in a statement shared with PEOPLE.
Jussie Smollett.Prince Williams/ Getty
Prince Williams/ Getty
The Illinois Supreme Court did not find any “error with the overwhelming evidence” presented at trial that led to his guilty verdict, Webb said.
“In fact, Mr. Smollett did not even challenge the sufficiency of the evidence against him in his appeal to the Illinois Supreme Court,” the special prosecutor added.
Want to keep up with the latest crime coverage? Sign up forPEOPLE’sfree True Crime newsletterfor breaking crime news, ongoing trial coverage and details of intriguing unsolved cases.
TheEmpireactor has maintained his innocence, and addressed the incident in aninterview with PEOPLEin September.
“I was numb,” Smollett told PEOPLE. “I didn’t know how to connect the dots. I really genuinely did not know. I couldn’t make sense of what was going on, and I couldn’t make sense of what people were actually thinking … what exactly do they think happened? I couldn’t put two and two together.”
source: people.com